SALIENT FEATURES OF PRANAY SETHI’S CASE AND GUIDELINES GIVEN WHILE DEALING WITH MATOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS CASES
APPLICABILITY OF CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE IN CASE OF INJURED/CLAIMANT IN DRUNKEN STATE IN MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL
WITHDRAWAL AND TRANSFER OF MCOPS TO FACILITATE COMPROMISE ARRIVED AT BETWEEN INSURER AND CLAIMANTS DURING COVID-19 LOCKDOWN – PERMISSIBILITY
WHETHER TRIBUNAL EMPOWERED TO ADJUDICATE CLAIM PETITION IN RESPECT OF OWNER CUM DRIVER ON BASIS OF PERSONAL ACCIDENT POLICY IS UNCONNECTED WITH PROVISIONS OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT.
SCOPE OF SECTION 163-A OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT  IN CASE OF A VICTIM BEING OWNER OR BORROWER OF THE VEHICLE.
IN MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CASES WHILE CALCULATING COMPENSATION AMOUNT SALRY RECEIVED BY THE LEGALHEIR WHO GOT EMPLOYMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND CAN NOT BE DEDUCTED.
ASSESMENT OF DISABILITY BY MEDICAL BOARD AND ISSUANCE OF DISABILITY CERTIFICATE IN MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS INJURY CASES