Ms marg limited vs sushil lalwani

 M/s. Marg Limited v. Sushil Lalwani 

(Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 402)

Rejection Of Plaint Not Automatic Upon Finding Of Deficit Court Fee: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court was considering an appeal filed against an order of the Madras High Court, rejecting a plaint.

--------------------

S. Valliammai & Others v. S. Ramanathan & Another

(Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 372)

Order II Rule 2 CPC Can't Be Invoked For Rejection Of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, Requires Evidence

The Court clarified that the bar requires a comparative analysis of the causes of action in both suits, which can only be determined after evidence is led.

------------------

IEEE MUMBAI SECTION WELFARE ASSOCIATION vs GLOBAL IEEE INSTITUTE FOR ENGINEERS  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).7235/2025 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).14208 OF 2025)

Temporary Injunction in Appeal Against Plaint Rejection - Requirement of Subsisting Plaint - No temporary injunction can be granted in an appeal against the rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11, CPC, as the plaint ceases to exist upon rejection. A subsisting plaint is essential for granting a temporary injunction. An injunction order becomes invalid upon plaint rejection and can only be revived if the plaint is restored. The High Court erred in granting a temporary injunction during the pendency of an appeal against plaint rejection, as the appeal does not constitute a continuation of the suit. Appeal allowed, impugned High Court order granting temporary injunction set aside.

--------------------

Vinod Infra Developers Ltd. v. Mahaveer Lunia & Ors.

 (Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 772)

Plaint Cannot Be Rejected in Its Entirety Merely Because One Of The Prayers Or Reliefs Sought Is Legally Untenable: Supreme Court

The Court said that when a plaint contains distinct causes of action, including one involving triable issues on title to immovable property, it cannot be rejected in its entirety under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

---------------------

Gurmeet Singh Sachdeva v. Skyways Air Services Pvt. Ltd

Case no.: CM(M) 147/2024

Documents Filed With Plaint Can Be Considered To Determine Whether It Discloses 'Cause Of Action': Delhi High Court

-------------------

Post a Comment

0 Comments