Difference
between exemption from appearance u/s 205 CrPC and 317 CrPC
The difference between
exemption from appearance u/s 205 CrPC and 317 CrPC are explained by the
Hon'ble Patna High Court in Manish Gai VS State of Bihar 2007 CrLJ 1358
(1360)
as follows:
" The Provisions of
Section 205 Crpc and Section 317, CrPC are
two different provisions.
They have been engrafted by the
Legislature knowing fully
well the existence of each other
provision. Section 205
CrPC gives a discretion to the court to
exempt a person from
personal appearance till such time his
personal appearance was
necessary for the trial whereas Section
317, CrPC is a
provisions, where on any particular day where
accused is required to be
present in person, he is unable to come or
appear, he may seek leave
and be absent and for this he is to move
to the court under
Section 317, CrPC. In operation both the
Sections are different
and distinct". In the light of the distinction drawn between the
Provisions of 205 CrPC and 317 CrPC in the decision cited above, it is clear
that Section 317 CrPC is applicable to dispense with the presence of the
accused on a specific day of hearing and not for all further proceedings.
Therefore, the petition praying to dispense with his personal attendance in all
further proceedings except the hearing dates on which he has to appear without
fail, can maintain a petition u/s 205 CrPC. The provision that exempts an
accused from appearing on all further proceedings u/s 205 CrPC is reproduced
hereunder:
"Whenever a
Magistrate issues a summons, he may, if he sees reason so to do, dispense with
the personal attendance of the accused and permit him to appear by his pleader.
(2) But the Magistrate
inquiring into or trying the case may, in his
discretion, at any stage
of the proceedings, direct the personal
attendance of the
accused, an, if necessary, enforce such attendance in the manner herein before
provided".
A plain reading of
Section 205 CrPC would make it clear that it empowered the court to dispense
with the personal attendance of the accused and permit him to appear by his counsel
and similarly it has conferred discretion to direct the personal attendance of
the accused at any stage of the case and it has also conferred powers to take
coercive steps to enforce the attendance of the accused by issuing summon or
warrant.
0 Comments