ALL MURDERS ARE CULPABLE HOMICIDE, BUT ALL
CULPABLE HOMICIDES ARE NOT MURDERS. |
Section 300 of IPC reads thus,
1. except
in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act
by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or
2. If it is
done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to
be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused, or
3. If it is
done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person and the bodily
injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature
to cause death, or
4. If the
person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it
must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to
cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of
causing death or such injury as aforesaid.
ILLUSTRATIONS
a. A shots Z
with the intention of killing him. Z dies in consequence. A commits murder.
b. A
knowing that Z is labouring under such a disease that a blow is likely to cause
his death, strikes him with the intention of causing bodily injury. Z dies in
consequence of the blow. A is guilty of murder, although the blow might not
have been sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause the death of a
person in a sound state of health. But if A, not knowing that Z is labouring
under any disease, gives him such a blow as would not in the ordinary course of
nature kill a person in a sound state of health, here A although he may intend
to cause bodily injury, is not guilty of murder, if he did not intend to cause
death, or such bodily injury as in the ordinary course of nature would cause
death.
c. A
intentionally gives Z a sword – cut or club – wound sufficient to cause the
death of a man in the ordinary course of nature. Z dies in consequence. Here a
is guilty of murder, although he may not have intended to cause Z’s death.
d. A
without any excuse fires a loaded cannon into a crowd of persons and kills one
of them. A is guilty of murder, although he may not have had a premeditated
design to kill any particular individual.
EXCEPTION 1:-
Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender,
whilst deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation,
causes the death of the person who gave the provocation or causes the death of
any other person by mistake or accident.
The above exception is subject to the following
provisions:-
1. That the
provocation is not sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse
for killing or doing harm to any person
2. That the
provocation is not given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public
servant in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant.
3. That the
provocation is not given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right
of private defence.
Explanation:
Whether
the provocation was grave and sudden enough to prevent the offence from
amounting to murder is a question of fact.
ILLUSTRATIONS:-
a. A, under
the influence of passion excited by a provocation given by Z, intentionally
kills Y, Z’s child. This is murder, in
as much as the provocation was not given by the child, and the death of the
child was not caused by accident or misfortune in doing an act caused by the
provocation.
b. Y gives
grave and sudden provocation to A. A, on this provocation, fires a pistol at Y,
neither intending nor knowing himself to be likely to kill Z, who is near him,
but out of sight. A kills Z. Here A has not committed murder, but merely
culpable homicide.
c. A is
lawfully arrested by Z, a bailiff. A is excited to sudden and violent passion
by the arrest, and kills Z. This is murder, in as much as the provocation was
given by a thing done by a public servant in the exercise of his powers.
d. A
appears as a witness before Z, a magistrate. Z says that he does not believe a
word of A’s deposition, and that A has perjured himself. A is moved to sudden
passion by these words, and kills Z.. This is murder.
e. A
attempts to pull Z’s nose. Z, in the exercise of the right of private defence,
lays hold of A to prevent him from doing so. A is moved to sudden and violent
passion in consequence and kills Z. This is murder, in as much as the
provocation was given by a thing done in the exercise of the right of private
defence.
f. Z
strikes B. B is by the provocation excited to violent rage. A, a bystander
intending to take advantage of B’s rage, and to cause him kill Z. Puts a knife
into B’s hand for that purpose. B kills Z with the knife. Here B may have
committed only culpable homicide, but A is guilty of murder.
EXCEPTION
II:-
Culpable
homicide is mot murder if the offender, in the exercise in good faith of the
right of private defence of person or property, exceeds the power given to him
by law and causes the death of the person against whom he is exercising such
right of defence without premeditation, and without any intention of doing more
harm than is necessary for the purpose of such defence.
ILLUSTRATION
Z attempts
to horsewhip A, not in such a manner as to cause a grievous hurt to A. A draws
a pistol. Z persists in the assault. A believing in good faith that he can by
no other means prevent himself from being horsewhipped shoots Z dead. A has not
committed murder but only culpable homicide.
EXCEPTION
3
Culpable
homicide is not murder if the offender, being a public servant or aiding a
public servant acting for the advancement of public justice, exceeds the powers
given to him by law, and causes death by doing an act which he, in good faith,
believes to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of his duty as such
public servant and without ill-will towards the person whose death is caused.
EXCEPTION
4
Culpable
homicide is not murder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden
fight, in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender’s
having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner.
Explanation:
It is immaterial in such cases which party offers the provocation or commits
the first assault.
Exception
5: Culpable homicide is not murder when the person whose death is caused, being
above the age of eighteen years, suffers death or takes the risk of death with
his own consent.
Illustration
A by
instigation, voluntarily causes Z, a person under eighteen years of age to
commit suicide. Here, on account of Z’s youth, he was incapable of giving
consent to his own death. A has therefore abetted murder.
0 Comments