Important judgments

 CHANNAPPA (D) THR. LRS. VS. PARVATEWWA (D) THR. LRS. 

CIVIL APPEAL NO.___ OF 2026[ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8536 OF 2024]

2026 INSC 343

2026 LiveLaw (SC) 354

Title Suit Hit By 'Constructive Res Judicata' If Plaintiff Omitted It In Earlier Injunction Suit Where Title Was Disputed : Supreme Court

--------------------

Mrs. Rachna Singh vs. Manish and Others 

 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 24557 of 2019

Partners Personally Liable for Firm’s Dishonoured Cheques Even if Not Signatories: Madhya Pradesh High Court

-------------------

SRK Devbuild Pvt Ltd Through Its

Liquidator Mr. Ravi Kapoor vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr 2026:DHC:1710

Company Not Automatically Free From Cheque Bounce Liability If Director Issued Cheque From Personal Account

-------------------

Saroj Pandey v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO._________OF 2026(@ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 21322 of 2025)

2026 INSC 324

2026 LiveLaw (SC) 349

S.142 NI Act | Signing Of Board Resolution Doesn't Mean Director Was Aware Of Company's Day-To-Day Affairs : Supreme Court

--------------------

Renuka vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another 

Criminal Appeal of 2026 (@SLP (Crl.) No. 7829 of 2023)

Cheque Dishonour Case Cannot Be Dismissed at Pre-Trial Stage on Enforceable Debt Issue: Supreme Court Restores Complaint

-------------------

Clara Dominic v. Tomy Eapen and Ors Crl MC No. 1782 of 2026

Co-operative Bank (Society) is not a “banker” and that the instrument (withdrawal slip) in question cannot be treated as a cheque is devoid of any merit. The substance of the transaction, and it its form or nomenclature, is determinative. If the instrument operates as a mandate for payment drawn on an account maintained with an institution carrying on banking functions, it would fall within the ambit of the N.I. Act.

-------------------

Morarjee Textiles Ltd vs Union of India WRIT PETITION NO. 2874 OF 2012 2026 LLBiz HC (BOM) 189

Amounts Deposited Pursuant To Court Orders Remain Assets Of The Corporate Debtor: Bombay High Court

--------------------

Punjab National Bank and Kotim Reddy Anitha 

Company Petition IB/65/95/HDB/2025 

2026 LLBiz NCLT (HYD) 319

Dispatch Of Statutory Demand Notice to Last Known Address Constitutes Valid Service: NCLT Hyderabad

In view of the deemed-service clause contained in the Guarantee Agreement dated 01.03.2012, the statutory demand notice having been dispatched to the address of the Personal Guarantor as recorded in the said agreement shall be deemed to have been duly served.

------------------